<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Equipment failure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cycling.finial.com/blog/2006/11/10/equipment-failure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cycling.finial.com/blog/2006/11/10/equipment-failure/</link>
	<description>Cycling, articles, sites, and thoughts</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Greg!</title>
		<link>http://cycling.finial.com/blog/2006/11/10/equipment-failure/#comment-13743</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 01:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cycling.finial.com/blog/?p=571#comment-13743</guid>
		<description>I believe I was already on 'The List'. 

Just because I'm paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe I was already on &#8216;The List&#8217;. </p>
<p>Just because I&#8217;m paranoid doesn&#8217;t mean they&#8217;re not out to get me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: todd</title>
		<link>http://cycling.finial.com/blog/2006/11/10/equipment-failure/#comment-13737</link>
		<dc:creator>todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 22:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cycling.finial.com/blog/?p=571#comment-13737</guid>
		<description>You should never have mentioned that on a public website. Your name is now on The List.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should never have mentioned that on a public website. Your name is now on The List.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg!</title>
		<link>http://cycling.finial.com/blog/2006/11/10/equipment-failure/#comment-13727</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 17:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cycling.finial.com/blog/?p=571#comment-13727</guid>
		<description>I'm pretty sure that &lt;i&gt;Error 51&lt;/i&gt; has something to do with &lt;i&gt;Area 51&lt;/i&gt;. Of course, due to the massive government cover-up I can't substantiate this theory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure that <i>Error 51</i> has something to do with <i>Area 51</i>. Of course, due to the massive government cover-up I can&#8217;t substantiate this theory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: todd</title>
		<link>http://cycling.finial.com/blog/2006/11/10/equipment-failure/#comment-13598</link>
		<dc:creator>todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 21:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cycling.finial.com/blog/?p=571#comment-13598</guid>
		<description>Well, I reseated the cables. We'll see if that does anything. I was going to just replace the cable, but when I got the box open, it turns out these are SATA drives, not IDE/ATA and all I have is an IDE cables. Those SATA cables are pretty heavy duty things. It's hard to see how they'd fail. But in any case, &lt;a href="http://www.microcenter.com/search_results_e.phtml?dropdown_method=keyword&#038;dropdown_keyword=serial+ata+cable" rel="nofollow"&gt;they're not terribly expensive&lt;/a&gt;. 

Rebooted at 4:33 pm. We'll see what the logs have to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I reseated the cables. We&#8217;ll see if that does anything. I was going to just replace the cable, but when I got the box open, it turns out these are SATA drives, not IDE/ATA and all I have is an IDE cables. Those SATA cables are pretty heavy duty things. It&#8217;s hard to see how they&#8217;d fail. But in any case, <a href="http://www.microcenter.com/search_results_e.phtml?dropdown_method=keyword&#038;dropdown_keyword=serial+ata+cable" rel="nofollow">they&#8217;re not terribly expensive</a>. </p>
<p>Rebooted at 4:33 pm. We&#8217;ll see what the logs have to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: todd</title>
		<link>http://cycling.finial.com/blog/2006/11/10/equipment-failure/#comment-13585</link>
		<dc:creator>todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 17:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cycling.finial.com/blog/?p=571#comment-13585</guid>
		<description>Ah, no. The new drive is an &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Vantec-NexStar-Mirror-External-Enclosure/dp/B0009HLAD0/" rel="nofollow"&gt;external USB drive&lt;/a&gt;, it doesn't go through the controller, I don't think. 

I finally got the MS page about the errors. They both say "bad cable", so I'll start with that. Am I right in thinking there's a single controller for both drives? I'm getting errors about the D drive, I think (assuming that's what \Harddisk0\D means).

The errors go back to last july, but I think the logs truncate then. The errors probably go beyond that as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, no. The new drive is an <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Vantec-NexStar-Mirror-External-Enclosure/dp/B0009HLAD0/" rel="nofollow">external USB drive</a>, it doesn&#8217;t go through the controller, I don&#8217;t think. </p>
<p>I finally got the MS page about the errors. They both say &#8220;bad cable&#8221;, so I&#8217;ll start with that. Am I right in thinking there&#8217;s a single controller for both drives? I&#8217;m getting errors about the D drive, I think (assuming that&#8217;s what \Harddisk0\D means).</p>
<p>The errors go back to last july, but I think the logs truncate then. The errors probably go beyond that as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://cycling.finial.com/blog/2006/11/10/equipment-failure/#comment-13583</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 16:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cycling.finial.com/blog/?p=571#comment-13583</guid>
		<description>I was thinking that perhaps the introduction of a new drive to a running controller might lead it to confuse the new drive as one of the already installed ones.  Like a messed up hot swap or something.  Then you rebooted, and it straightened itself out again.  Obviously that should never happen, but then again...

But if the errors go back to last July, that's a different story.  Is the server running RAID with parity?  Perhaps there's a problem with one of the disks in the array, but the controller is smart enough to keep things running, logging the errors in the meantime.  Scandisk should be able to notice that one...

/half blind, grasping at straws</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking that perhaps the introduction of a new drive to a running controller might lead it to confuse the new drive as one of the already installed ones.  Like a messed up hot swap or something.  Then you rebooted, and it straightened itself out again.  Obviously that should never happen, but then again&#8230;</p>
<p>But if the errors go back to last July, that&#8217;s a different story.  Is the server running RAID with parity?  Perhaps there&#8217;s a problem with one of the disks in the array, but the controller is smart enough to keep things running, logging the errors in the meantime.  Scandisk should be able to notice that one&#8230;</p>
<p>/half blind, grasping at straws</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: todd</title>
		<link>http://cycling.finial.com/blog/2006/11/10/equipment-failure/#comment-13582</link>
		<dc:creator>todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 16:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cycling.finial.com/blog/?p=571#comment-13582</guid>
		<description>What do you mean "confuse the disk controllers?" Confuse them how?

I looked at the error logs and there are controller parity errors going back as far as the log exists (last July). They seem to be increasing in number, though. That doesn't make me feel too comfortable. I'm not quite sure what to do. Scandisk is still running. I'm really hoping there's a bad sector on the disk, possibly the Nero location, but that doesn't really explain why there are so many errors. I use Nero almost never. And I have doubts as to whether a bad disk sector would show up as a controller parity error. 

There are also a lot of warnings saying something about an error on paging. I'm a bit confused about what that means as well. To me "paging" means system paging, but AFAICT, it's complaining about the D drive. The paging files are on the C drive, I don't think thereare any on the D drive. Unless "paging" here just means block transfer or something.

At least I have everything backed up now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you mean &#8220;confuse the disk controllers?&#8221; Confuse them how?</p>
<p>I looked at the error logs and there are controller parity errors going back as far as the log exists (last July). They seem to be increasing in number, though. That doesn&#8217;t make me feel too comfortable. I&#8217;m not quite sure what to do. Scandisk is still running. I&#8217;m really hoping there&#8217;s a bad sector on the disk, possibly the Nero location, but that doesn&#8217;t really explain why there are so many errors. I use Nero almost never. And I have doubts as to whether a bad disk sector would show up as a controller parity error. </p>
<p>There are also a lot of warnings saying something about an error on paging. I&#8217;m a bit confused about what that means as well. To me &#8220;paging&#8221; means system paging, but AFAICT, it&#8217;s complaining about the D drive. The paging files are on the C drive, I don&#8217;t think thereare any on the D drive. Unless &#8220;paging&#8221; here just means block transfer or something.</p>
<p>At least I have everything backed up now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://cycling.finial.com/blog/2006/11/10/equipment-failure/#comment-13580</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 16:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cycling.finial.com/blog/?p=571#comment-13580</guid>
		<description>Yeow, that's not good.  Hopefully all you did was temporarily confuse the disk controllers and scandisk helps makes more sense out of things.

P.S. Holiday for you maybe.  At least my commute was less crowded this morning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeow, that&#8217;s not good.  Hopefully all you did was temporarily confuse the disk controllers and scandisk helps makes more sense out of things.</p>
<p>P.S. Holiday for you maybe.  At least my commute was less crowded this morning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
